I'm a fan of a 53% movement that focuses on competency majoritarianism, rather than indiscriminately lumping in with the wealthy

I'm actually a fan of a 53% (or so movement), and have been advocating for it for awhile, but NOT a 53% that lumps in indiscriminately with the wealthy, but rather with the competent. A sort of technocratic majoritarianism disfavors both small stakes nepotism and cronyism (DMV jobs should go to the most competent) and large stakes anti-technocratic power distributions (George W. Bush as president).